Qigong history

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main article: Qigong

Qigong history

Traditional Chinese


Simplified Chinese



This article contains Chinese text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Chinese characters.

Look up qigong in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

The history of qigong, the Chinese practice of aligning breath, movement, and awareness for exercise, healing, and martial arts training, extends back more than 4,000 years. Contemporary qigong is a complex accretion of the ancient Chinese meditative practice xing qi (行氣) or "circulating qi" and the gymnastic breathing exercise tao yin (導引) or "guiding and pulling", with roots in the I Ching and occult arts; philosophical traditions of Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism,traditional Chinese medicine and martial arts; along with influences of contemporary concepts of health, science, meditation, and exercise.[1][2]


Origins and ancient history

Archeological evidence suggests that the first forms of qigong can be linked to ancient shamanic meditative practice and gymnastic exercises.[2] For example, a nearly 7000 year old Neolithic vessel depicts a priest-shaman (wu xi 巫覡) in the essential posture of meditative practice and gymnastic exercise of early qigong. Shamanic rituals and ideas eventually evolved and formalized into Taoist beliefs and were incorporated into the field of traditional Chinese medicine.[3][4]

Roots in traditional medicine, philosophy, and martial arts

According to the traditional Chinese medical community, the origin of qigong is commonly attributed to the legendary Yellow Emperor (2696–2598 BCE) and the classic Huangdi Neijing book of internal medicine.[5][6][7]

Chinese scholars acknowledge Kǒngzǐ ("Confucius", 551–479 BCE) and Mèngzǐ ("Mencius", 385–302 BCE) as the founders of the Scholar qigong tradition. In their writings, they alluded to the concepts of qi training as methods of moral training.[8]

In the Taoist tradition, the writings of Lǎozǐ ("Lao Tzu", ca. 400 BCE) and Zhuāngzǐ; ("Chuang Tzu", ca. 300 BCE) both describe meditative cultivation and physical exercises as means to extend one's lifespan, and to access higher realms of existence.[9][10][11][12][13] The Taoist inner alchemical cultivation around the Song Dynasty (Chinese: 宋朝; pinyin: Sòng Cháo; Wade-Giles: Sung Ch'ao; IPA: [ sʊ̂ŋ tʂʰɑ̌ʊ̯ ]) between 960 and 1279, continued those Taoist traditions.

The Mawangdui Silk Texts (168 BCE) shows a series of Tao Yin (導引) exercises that bears physical resemblance to some of the health exercises being practiced today.[14]

Buddhism, originating in India and having its source in the Hindu culture, developed an extensive system of meditation and physical cultivation similar to yoga to help the practitioner achieve enlightenment, awakening one to one's true self. When Buddhism was transmitted to China, some of those practices were assimilated and eventually modified by the indigenous culture.[15] The resulting transformation was the start of the Chinese Buddhist qigong tradition. Chinese Buddhist practice reaches a climax with the emergence of Chán () Buddhism in the 7th century AD. Meditative practice was emphasized and a series of qigong exercises known as the Yijin Jing ("Muscle/Tendon Change Classic") was attributed to Bodhidharma. The Chinese martial arts community eventually identify this Yijing Jing as one of the secret training methods in Shaolin martial arts.[16]

Chinese martial arts practitioners, influenced by all the different elements within Chinese society, adapted and modified qigong theory with the goal of improving their fighting abilities.[17] Many Chinese martial arts paid homage to Taoism or Buddhism by claiming them as their original source. For example, Tai chi chuan is often described as being Taoist in origin.[18] Shaolin martial arts is named after the famous Buddhist Shaolin temple.[19]

The exchange of ideas between those different segments within Chinese society created rich, complex, and sometimes contradictory theory and methods of training. The difficulty in determining the correct training method, the traditional master-student method of transmission, and the belief that qigong represents a special and valuable knowledge limited the research and development of qigong to small but elite elements within Chinese society. Specialized texts were available, but were secretive and cryptic, and therefore limited to a selective few.[20] For the general population, qigong practice was a component of traditional Chinese medicine. This medical system was developed based on experience, along with philosophical and folk practices.[21]

Western influence

Starting in the 16th century, the nature and values of Chinese society changed radically, with the arrival and dissemination of Western ideas, technology, and culture.[22] In the declining period of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912), the entire Chinese philosophy and culture was re-examined. Chinese medicine, as part of the Chinese tradition, was re-evaluated in response to the perceived effectiveness of Western medicine.[23] The conflict between Eastern and Western approaches reached a crisis point at the beginning of the Republican period. Larger segments within Chinese society began to openly challenge traditional Chinese philosophies such as Confucianism and Taoism and advocated the wholesale adoption of Western principles. In response, many nationalists countered by pointing out the limitation of Western society and the success of Chinese ideas such as TCM and qigong. This resulted in many publications promoting Chinese cultural practices, with introduction of qigong to the general population.[24] Thus conflicting worldviews shaped the development of qigong.

During the turmoil of the fall of the Qing Dynasty and through to the Republican Period (1912–49), Chinese society was fighting for its own survival and there was little attention on the development of qigong.

Qigong in the communist era

Concerted efforts to re-establish Chinese culture under a new ideology began after the creation of the People’s Republic of China in 1945. The new ruling government under the leadership of Mao Zedong rejected all ties to traditional Chinese philosophies such as Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. Instead, the Chinese government promoted a socialist view. Through a series of government directed programs that lasted for nearly three decades (1949–1976), the entire fabric of Chinese society was torn apart and reorganized. It was in this environment that the current attitude toward qigong was born in Mainland China.

Mao Zedong himself recognized the conflicting aims between the rejection of feudalistic ideas of the past and the benefits derived from those ideas. Traditional Chinese medicine was a clear example of this conflict. His solution can be summarized by his famous phrase “Chinese medicine is a great treasure house! We must make efforts to uncover it and raise its standards!”, which legitimized the practice of traditional Chinese medicine and created an impetus to develop a stronger scientific basis.[21] The subject of qigong underwent a similar process of transformation. The historical elements of qigong were stripped to create a more scientific basis for the practice.[25]

In the early 1950s, Liu Guizhen (劉貴珍) (1920–83), a doctor by training, used his family’s method of body cultivation to successfully cure himself of various aliments.[26] He then promoted his method to his patients and eventually published a book, Qi Gong liaofa shiyan (氣功療法實驗) to promote his successes. His efforts to re-define qigong without a religious or philosophical context proved to be acceptable to the ruling government.[27] The popularity and success of Liu’s book and the government’s strong support for Traditional Chinese medicine resulted in the formation of Qigong department within Universities and hospitals that practiced Traditional Chinese medicine. As a result, the first institutional support for qigong was established across China, but this practice remained under tight control and had limited access by the general public.[25]

Qigong in the era of reconstruction

In the late 1970s, with the fall of the Gang of Four and the start Era of Reconstruction, there was a new openness in Chinese society. The practice of qigong spread from an institutional setting to a popular movement led by charismatic promoters. Guo Lin (郭林), a Beijing artist who claimed to have cured herself of uterine cancer in the 1960s, was one of the first qigong masters to teach qigong openly to the general public outside an institutional setting.[28] Scientists, free from the repression of the Cultural Revolution, were able to seek new challenges. Among the new subjects of inquiry, they studied the effects of qigong and provided scientific foundations for qigong practice. In 1979, Gu Hansen of the Shanghai Institute of Atomic Research first reported on the external measurement of qi.[28] This research proved to be critical in promoting the notion of a scientific basis for qigong. Other reports of external evidence of qi quickly followed. Other forms of measurements, personal testimonies on the effectiveness of qigong treatment and demonstration of the uses of qigong found in the martial arts were used to illustrate the practical realities of the qigong.[25][28]

In the early 1980s, the enthusiasm for this new external qi paradigm eventually led to the use of qi as an explanation for paranormal abilities such as Extrasensory perception (ESP) and psychokinesis.[29] The increasingly exaggerated claims of qigong practice prompted some elements within the Chinese government to warn of the dangers of this paranormal craze and the prevalence of pseudoscientific beliefs.[30] Leading public figures Qian Xuesen (钱学森), eminent scientist and founder of Chinese Rocketry, and Zhang Zhenhuan (张震寰) a former general, rushed to defend qigong practice. They championed the view that qigong was a new science of the mind. A compromise on the support of qigong activities was eventually reached by various factions within the Chinese government. Qigong activity was to be regulated, with the establishment of the China Qigong Scientific Research Association under the leadership of Zhang Zhenhuan. Overt criticism of the paranormal research was to be muted.[28]

By the middle of the 1980s, there were more than 2000 qigong organizations and between 60 and 200 million practitioners across China, almost one fifth of the Chinese population. This growth was fueled by the tacit support of small elements within the Chinese government, reduced criticism of qigong practice, pent-up demand within Chinese society for alternative belief systems, and improved methods of communication that resulted in mass adaptation of qigong practice, in what has been termed "qigong fever".[31] By the end of the 1980s, qigong practices could be found within all segments of Chinese society.[32]

By the end of the 1990s, the explosive growth in the number of qigong practitioners had led to the revival of the old traditions that accompanied qigong development. Qigong organizations such as Falun Gong re-introduced moral and religious elements associated with their training methods. Such practices eventually led to direct conflict with the central authorities. By 1999, there was a systematic crackdown on qigong organizations that were perceived to challenge State control over Chinese society, including shutdown of qigong clinics and hospitals, and banning groups such as Zhong Gong and Falun Gong.[33][34] Since the crackdown, qigong research and practice have only been officially supported in the context of health functions and as a field of study within traditional Chinese medicine. The Chinese Health Qigong Association was established in 2000 to regulate public qigong practice, restricting the number of people that could gather at a time, requiring state approved training and certification of instructors, limiting practice to four standardized forms of daoyin from the classical medical tradition, and encouraging other types of recreation and exercise such as yoga, t'ai chi, senior disco dancing, and exercise machines.[35][36]

Spread of qigong

Migration, travel, and exploration contributed to the spread of qigong practice beyond the Chinese community. Western societies first encountered qigong concepts through exposure to traditional Chinese medicine, Chinese philosophy and the Chinese martial arts.[37]

It was not until China opened up to the Western World with the visit of President Nixon in 1972 and the subsequent exchanges between China and the West that Western society became aware of qigong. The ideas of qigong were quickly embraced by alternative therapists.[38] The idea of qi as a form of living energy also found a receptive audience within the New Age movement.[39] When the Chinese qigong community started to report cases of paranormal activity, Western researchers in the field were also excited by those findings.[citation needed] Chinese findings were reviewed [40] and various qigong practitioners were invited to the West to demonstrate those results.[29]

The American public’s first exposure to qigong was in the PBS series Healing and the Mind with Bill Moyers in 1993.[41] In the documentary, Moyers provided an in-depth look at alternatives to Western medicine and introduced the audience to traditional Chinese medicine, acupuncture, and qigong. As a result, qigong practice spread to the general public in the US.[42]

Contemporary qigong

Historically, the effect of qigong practice has always been subjective. It ranges from feelings of calm, peace, and well being to cure of chronic medical conditions. Throughout history, remarkable claims have been made about results of qigong practice. The journey towards self-enlightenment can include descriptions of out of body experiences and miraculous powers for both the Buddhist [43] [44] and the Taoist[45] .[46] For some individuals, qigong training is seen as providing a curative function after extensive training. For martial artists, qigong training is credited as the basis for developing extraordinary powers such as the ability to withstand blows and the ability to break hard objects.

In the early 1980s, the Chinese scientific community attempted to verify the principles of qi through external measurements. Initially, they reported great success suggesting that qi can be measured as a form of electrical magnetic radiation. Other reports indicates that qi can induce external effects such as changing the properties of a liquid, clairvoyance, and telekinesis.[29] Those reports created great excitement within the paranormal [47] [48] and para psychological research communities.[49] [50]

However, those reports were severely criticized by the conventional scientific community both within China [30] and outside of China.[51][52][53] The main criticism from the conventional scientific establishment about qigong research is the lack of application of the principles of the scientific method notably the absence of scientific rigor, the small sample sizes, the uncontrolled testing environment and lack of reproducibility. [54] In addition to those criticisms, the public acceptance of paranormal properties arising from qigong practice contributed to social unrest.[55]

As a result of those controversies, the emphasis on qigong research within Mainland Chinas has changed from externally verifying the existence of qi to focus on effects on health and as a component of Traditional Chinese Medicine without any reference to other aspects of traditional qigong practice.

Today, millions of people worldwide practice qigong. Similar to its historical origin, those interested in qigong come from diverse backgrounds and practice it for diverse reasons, including for exercise, recreation, preventative medicine, self-healing, self-cultivation, meditation, and martial arts training.


  • Li, Ling (李零) (2001). A Study on Chinese Occult Arts, Zhongguo fangshu kao 中國方術考. Eastern Press: Beijing.

  • Unschuld, Paul U (1985). Medicine in China: a History of Ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05023-1.

  • Porkert, Manfred (1974). The Theoretical Foundations of Chinese Medicine: Systems of Correspondence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-16058-7.

  • Ho, Peng Yoke; Peter Lisowski (1997). A Brief History of Chinese Medicine. World Scientific. ISBN 981-02-2803-1.

  • Ni, Maoshing (1995). The Yellow Emperor's Classic of medicine: a new translation of the Neijing Suwen with commentary. Boston: Shambhala. ISBN 1-57062-080-6.

  • Maciocia, Giovanni (1989). The foundations of Chinese medicine: a comprehensive text for acupuncturists and herbalists. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0-443-03980-1.

  • Blofeld, John Eaton Calthorpe (1979). Taoism: the quest for immortality. London: Unwin Paperbacks. ISBN 0-04-299008-4.

  • Graham, AL (1989). Disputers of the Tao: philosophical argument in ancient China. La Salle, IL: Open Court. ISBN 0-8126-9087-7.

  • Chuang-tzŭ: the inner chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. 2001. ISBN 0-87220-581-9.

  • "The Wonders of Qigong: a Chinese Exercise for Fitness, Health, and Longevity". China Sports Magazine (Wayfarer Publications). 1985.

  • Zucher, Erik (2007). The Buddhist conquest of China: the spread and adaptation of Buddhism in early medieval China Volume 11 of Sinica Leidensia. BRILL. ISBN 90-04-15604-6.

  • Yang, Jwing-Ming (2000). Qigong, The Secret of Youth. YMAA Publication Center. ISBN 978-1-886969-84-1.

  • Liang, Shou-Yu; Wen-Ching Wu; Denise Breiter-Wu (1997). Qigong Empowerment: A Guide to Medical, Taoist, Buddhist, and Wushu Energy Cultivation. Way of the Dragon Pub. ISBN 1-889659-02-9.

  • Galante, Lawrence; Selman, Betsy (1981). Tai chi: the supreme ultimate. York Beach, ME: S. Weiser. ISBN 978-0-87728-497-0.

  • Shahar, Meir (2008). The Shaolin monastery: history, religion, and the Chinese martial arts. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3110-3.

  • Unschuld, Paul U (1985). Medicine in China: a history of ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06216-0.

  • Mungello, David E (2009). The Great Encounter of China and the West, 1500–1800, Third Edition (Critical Issues in History). Rowman Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7425-5798-7.

  • Wang, Zhen'guo; Chen, Ping; Xie, Peiping (1999). History and development in traditional Chinese medicine. Beijing: Science press. ISBN 978-7-03-006567-4.

  • Lin, Yü-sheng; Lin, Yü-sheng (1979). The crisis of Chinese consciousness: radical antitraditionalism in the May Fourth era. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-07410-4.

  • Otehode, Utiraruto (2009). "The Creation and Reemergence of Qigong in China". In Ashiwa, Yoshiko; Wank, David L. Making religion, making the state: the politics of religion in modern China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. pp. 241–265. ISBN 978-0-8047-5842-0.

  • Palmer, David A. (2007). Qigong fever: body, science, and utopia in China. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-14066-5.

  • Dong, Paul (2000). China's major mysteries: paranormal phenomena and the unexplained in the People's Republic. San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals. ISBN 978-0-8351-2676-2.

  • Lin, Zixin (2000). Qigong: Chinese medicine or pseudoscience. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-57392-232-6.

  • Ownby, David (2007). "Qigong, Falun Gong and the Body Politic in Contemporary China". In Jensen, Lionel M.; Weston, Timothy B. China's transformations: the stories beyond the headlines. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 90–128. ISBN 978-0-7425-3863-4.

  • Penny, Benjamin (1993). "Qigong, Daoism and Science: some contexts for the qigong boom". In Lee, M.; Syrokomla-Stefanowska, A.D. Modernisation of the Chinese Past. Sydney: Wild Peony. pp. 166–179. ISBN 978-0-86758-658-9.

  • Ownby, David (2008). Falun Gong and the future of China. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-532905-6.

  • Karchmer, Eric (2002). "Magic, Science and Qigong in Contemporary China". In Blum, Susan Debra; Jensen, Lionel M. China off center: mapping the margins of the middle kingdom. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 311–22. ISBN 978-0-8248-2577-5.

  • Scheid, Volker (2002). Chinese medicine in contemporary China: plurality and synthesis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-2872-0.

  • Clarke, Peter (2006). New religions in global perspective: a study of religious change in the modern world. London: Routledge. pp. 336–7. ISBN 978-0-415-25747-3.

  • Goldstein, Michael J. (1999). Alternative Health Care. Temple University Press. ISBN 978-1-56639-678-3.

  • McDonald, Kevin (2006). Global Movements: Action and Culture. Blackwell Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-4051-1613-8.

  • Jonas, Wayne B; Crawford, Cindy (2003). Healing, intention, and energy medicine: science, research methods, and clinical implications. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0-443-07237-6.

  • Granoff, Phyllis; Shinohara, Koichi (1994). Monks and Magicians: Religious Biographies in Asia. Motilal Banarsidass,India. ISBN 978-81-208-1186-7.

  • Luk, Charles (1974). Empty Cloud: The Autobiography of the Chinese Zen Master Xu Yun. Element Books. ISBN 978-1-85230-031-9.

  • Giles, Herbert Allen; Balfour, Frederic Henry; Giles, Lionel; Conners, Shawn (2010). Biographies of Immortals - Legends of China - Special Edition. El Paso Norte Press. ISBN 1-934255-30-0.

  • Guiley, Rosemary (1994). Harper's Encyclopedia of Mystical Paranormal Experience. Castle Books. ISBN 978-0-7858-0202-0.

  • Broughton, Richard (1991). Parapsychology: the controversial science. New York, [NY]: Ballantine Books. ISBN 978-0-345-37958-0.

  • Beloff, John (1993). Parapsychology: a concise history. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-17376-0.

  • Shermer, Michael (2002). The Skeptic encyclopedia of pseudoscience, Volume 2. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 1-57607-653-9.

  • Wanjek, Christopher (2003). Bad medicine: misconceptions and misuses revealed, from distance healing to vitamin O. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 182–187. ISBN 0-471-43499-X.

  • Smith, Jonathan C. Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker's Toolkit. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8122-8.

  • Kurtz, Paul (2001). Skeptical Odysseys: Personal Accounts by the World's Leading Paranormal Inquirers. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-57392-884-7.

  1. Gittings, John (2006). The Changing Face of China: From Mao to Market. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 316. ISBN 978-0-19-280734-2.


Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) (Zhōng yī 中医/中醫)


Qigong 气功